標題: To me, that's a really disgusting way to do it [打印本頁] 作者: darah16204 時間: 2024-3-5 17:12 標題: To me, that's a really disgusting way to do it
Medical News Today's page provides medical accuracy and reviews of the product's medical relevance. However, the Today page is a page that uses medical authority to sell products. Particularly in the context of YMYL, it is sketchy and unreliable. Key lessons learned from analyzing product reviews and updates From a macro perspective, you need to provide actual product review content. Disguising sales-oriented content as reviews will not yield good results. Therefore, it can be said that it is no good to list products with strong sales-oriented expressions or without review content. In this way, product review updates, like core updates, are very detailed in their content. As with core updates, the tone of the content (e.g., sales purpose) and the overall quality and authority of the content are key to this equation. From a practical standpoint, adding the following items will help your page: buying guide Product specs In-depth and sufficient amount of review content One thing that stands out is that Google seems to like including buying guides on review pages. This seems reasonable.
It's important to know the specs and features of each product, but how can you decide whether the specs and features are suitable for you? What should I refer to? Buying guides and buying advice are Belgium Phone Number Data the answer to these needs. Conversely, many pages provide scientific information behind their reviews. Revealing review criteria increases transparency, but it does not provide information that encourages users to take action. I think this also makes sense. Transparency in content is great, but how much does it mean when users are choosing products or learning how to choose products? I'm not saying that you shouldn't create such content or that it has no impact.
From what I've seen, if a site has this kind of content but doesn't have a buying guide, it usually doesn't rank well (all else being equal). Will it bring about changes in the affiliate market? You might be tempted to think that this update will once again have a negative impact on the affiliate market. However, recent core updates have done similar things, so it's probably not new. Also, do updates like this point to the death of the affiliate market? Or does it mean that the affiliate market has reached maturity? Did the scheming marketing of the 1980s spell the death of marketing? No, it's not. The message was that users' tastes, thoughts, and overall outlook had changed. In the past, the Web accepted even obvious affiliate sites.
